WebRTC Solutions Industry News

[March 09, 2007]

What the Verizon Verdict Means for Vonage

(BusinessWeek Online Via Thomson Dialog NewsEdge)
Web-calling outfit Vonage suffered a major setback on Mar. 8 when an eight-person jury found it guilty of infringing on three patents owned by rival telco Verizon.

After a weeklong hearing in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, a jury ruled that Vonage Holdings (VG) must pay Verizon Communications (VZ) $58 million in damages and a 5.5% licensing fee per subscriber per month. The damages and fee fell short of what Verizon asked for, and the jury said Vonage didn't infringe on two of the patents at the heart of the case. It also found Vonage was not willful in its infringement, helping Vonage avoid stiffer penalties.

Injunction Likely

Though Vonage avoided a worst-case scenario, the verdict is hardly something to cheer about. The company's stock fell 3.86%, to $4.85, an all-time low, the day the verdict was announced. The decision and expected injunction barring Vonage from using Verizon technology without paying the royalty fee are likely to take a big financial toll and push back profitability targets. They could also undermine customer confidence and make Vonage and other Web-calling providers vulnerable to other lawsuits.

While the damages will likely be subject to an appeal that could take as long as two years [most analysts think a settlement between the two companies in the meantime is unlikely], the injunction and the license fees are likely to kick in this year. An injunction hearing has been set for Mar. 23 and analysts expect an injunction to take effect in April. Vonage said in a statement that if the court imposes the injunction, it will seek a stay from the Federal Court of Appeals.

With an injunction in place, Vonage either will have to pay Verizon royalties or rebuild its network so that it doesn't using the technology in question -- or face a service shutdown. Both options are fraught with risks. Verizon's patents cover a range of features, from call-waiting to how Web calls are connected to traditional phone lines. So coming up with a so-called workaround won't be easy, say Stifel, Nicolaus (SF) analysts. Vonage does have some patents of its own. In July, it acquired three patents from Digital Packet Licensing, saying the purchase would help it fend off litigation from Verizon and other companies such as Sprint Nextel (S). The Mar. 8 verdict shows the patents weren't as potent as Vonage had hoped.

Perils of a Workaround

Even if a workaround is found, putting it in place could be disruptive. Witness Research In Motion (RIMM), whose customers temporarily lost service after a network upgrade originally designed to combat patent-infringement claims. In a statement, Vonage didn't address the prospect of technology alternatives but said, "Vonage's customers should see no change to any aspect of their phone service."

Analysts aren't so sanguine. Some of Vonage's 2.2 million customers may jump ship amid the potential for tech glitches and other turmoil wrought by the decision, says Jon Arnold, a principal at consultancy J Arnold & Associates. "Subscribers will get nervous," Arnold says. The company's subscriber growth is already shaky. In the fourth quarter, Vonage lured 36,000 fewer subscribers than in the preceding period. "Their quarterly growth rate is [already] dropping, they are moving at a pace that's below the industry average," says Stephan Beckert, director of research at consultancy TeleGeography. If growth were to stall further, Vonage may take longer than previously expected to reach operating profitability. Before the verdict, Vonage expected to reach that milestone as soon as early 2008.

<pagebr/>

Appeals and network upgrades may also distract the company from its efforts to vie with rivals. The company had been considering offering wireless calling to better compete with cable operators [see BusinessWeek.com, 2/20/07, "Coming Up: Vonage Wireless?"].

Financial Pressure Could Lead to Buyout

Meeting other financial goals will become problematic should Vonage be forced to pay Verizon licensing fees. Vonage has enough cash -- about $500 million -- to last three years, says Clayton Moran, an analyst with Stanford Financial Group. Damages alone will take a bite out of that sum -- never mind any royalty fees levied after an appeal.

Here's why: Last year, Vonage booked about $29 a month in revenue per subscriber line. Its direct costs per line, excluding marketing, averaged $8.20 per subscriber per month, and the company still had $286 million in losses last year. With the new license fee, Vonage's costs per line would increase by about $1.6 per subscriber, or almost 20%.

The Verizon case could also have implications for Vonage's ongoing litigation with Sprint Nextel, which alleges Vonage infringes on seven of its patents. Sprint's complaint, filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas, is set to go to trial on Sept. 7. That lawsuit is also demanding an injunction on the use of Sprint technology. In light of the Verizon decision, Vonage may not choose to risk another lengthy trial and instead settle, says John Rabena, partner at law firm Sughrue Mion in Washington, D.C.

Big Players Protect Turf with Patents

With its financial position corroded, Vonage, long rumored to be shopping around for a buyer, could finally become cheap enough for an acquisition by a cable company, or even a telco like Verizon, whose VoiceWing Web-calling service has so far failed to take off. Indeed, Verizon's 19-page complaint notes: "Vonage's expanded marketing and advertising of its infringing services threaten to shift more customers and goodwill to its business at Verizon's expense" [see BusinessWeek.com, 5/5/06, "Verizon's VoIP Offensive"].

That's why this decision carries huge implications for the $4.4 billion U.S. VoIP-services industry as a whole. "The message this sends to the VoIP industry is, if you build a patent portfolio, it helps you negotiate in these situations," Rabena. The number of VoIP-related lawsuits mounted by telcos and other entrenched players could rise. According to the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office, there are 2,273 patents related to VoIP, many of them belonging to telecom old-timers like Verizon, AT&T (T), Motorola (MOT), Broadcom (BRCM), and Cisco (CSCO).

And that spells more trouble ahead for small Web-calling service providers looking to retain their foothold on the market. In his closing arguments on Mar. 7, Vonage's lawyer said, "this case is about choice." Thanks to the Verizon victory and other potential legal action in the future, the choices for Vonage will be far fewer.

Copyright 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All rights reserved.

[ Back To WebRTC Solutions's Homepage ]

FOLLOW US

Featured Podcasts

Oracle in Enterprise Communications

Most in the industry have heard of the acquisition of Acme Packet by Oracle. What you may not know is that Oracle has a number of telecommunications products including a UC suite, WebRTC Session Controller, and Operations monitoring tools. Oracle is pursuing both the enterprise and service provider.

Featured Whitepapers

WebRTC Security Concerns

This whitepaper covers two of the most relevant topics in communications industry today: WebRTC and security. We will introduce the problem of security in WebRTC including those traditional VoIP attacks that are going to be present in WebRTC services. Later we will mention ad-hoc WebRTC attacks and protection mechanisms, to close with an overview of identity management solutions.

Migrating Real Time Communications Services to the Web

In the Internet age, businesses that own fixed and mobile communication networks, including traditional Communications Service Providers (CSPs) of all kinds, are being challenged with some tough questions: How do we stay relevant to our customers?

Delivering Enterprise-Class Communications with WebRTC

WebRTC is an emerging industry standard for enabling Web browsers with real-time communications capabilities. It enables enterprises to enhance Web sites, empower BYOD users, and improve video collaboration and on-line meetings, to name but a few examples.

WebRTC Report Extract Reprint

This document examines the growing important of WebRTC, both generally and for telecom service providers. It considers the expanding range of use-cases, the multiple layers of interoperability likely to be desired by telcos, and some implications in terms of network integration and mobility.

WEBRTC SOLUTIONS PAPERS, SLIDES, COLLATERAL

Robust Enterprise Grade WebRTC Systems and Services


The emerging WebRTC standard has become one of the industry's hottest topics – and with good reason. Being able to "communications enable the web" has Communications Service Providers as well as Enterprises busily making plans for deployment. But, as these plans unfold, reality is starting to intrude on those plans. Our expectations of telephony services are much higher than web browsing. We expect the phone to connect instantly, operate with minimal disruption, and work seamless across any network, anywhere, at any time. There is also an understanding that phone service is inherently secure. With WebRTC, the expectation is for these applications to behave in the same manner.

This session looks at the user experience and expectations of a WebRTC Enterprise service. It will also cover how a WebRTC enterprise handles security, reliability, and interoperability within browsers and networks.

ORACLE COMMUNICATIONS WEBRTC SESSION CONTROLLER

The Oracle Communications WebRTC Session Controller enables communications service providers (CSPs) and enterprises to offer WebRTC services – from virtually any device, across virtually any network – with carrier-grade reliability and security.

Sales Presentation: Oracle Communications WebRTC Session Controller

Agenda:
- WebRTC Market and Opportunities
- WebRTC Challenges
- Oracle Communication WebRTC Session   Controller
- Summary

ORACLE COMMUNICATIONS WEBRTC SESSION CONTROLLER SOLUTION

Communication Service Provider (CSP) voice service revenues continue to face pressure due to shifts in communication preferences and competition from non-traditional service providers. Voice communications are now often embedded into applications outside the domain of traditional telephony voice usage. CSPs have been challenged to effectively leverage and monetize new web-oriented communications technologies.