WebRTC Solutions Industry News

TMCNet:  Apple v. Samsung: feuding tech giants return to court in epic patent battle

[December 03, 2012]

Apple v. Samsung: feuding tech giants return to court in epic patent battle

SAN JOSE, Dec 03, 2012 (San Jose Mercury News - McClatchy-Tribune Information Services via COMTEX) -- With a $1 billion verdict hanging in the balance, feuding tech titans Apple and Samsung return to federal court this week armed with the latest legal ammunition in their global smartphone and tablet war.

This duel, which unfolds before U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh on Thursday, centers on Samsung's bid to overturn a jury's stunning verdict in August that found the South Korean tech giant "willfully" copied Apple's iPhone and iPad in its own increasingly popular smartphones and tablets.

But Thursday's hearing is also very much about Apple's attempt to exact even more punishment against Samsung, its chief rival with products such as the Android-driven Galaxy line of smartphones. Apple has asked Koh to permanently ban the sale of more than two dozen Samsung devices in the United States, all of them older versions, as well as add more than $500 million to the $1 billion judgment under provisions for increasing damages for willful patent infringement.

If the judge sides with Apple, experts predict it could fuel a push by Apple to expand any injunction to cover some of Samsung's newer smartphones and tablets, already the target of a second pending federal patent lawsuit.

For Samsung, the post-trial sparring is considered a prelude to an anticipated appeal to the U.S. Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, the Washington, D.C.-based court that hears patent cases and has thus far appeared more receptive to Samsung's legal arguments than Koh has. For the most part, legal experts do not expect Samsung to gain much relief from the San Jose federal judge, although some speculate she may be willing to pare the damages.

"I think Samsung faces an uphill battle in persuading Judge Koh to reverse the jury verdict," said Mark Lemley, a Stanford University law professor and patent expert. "The jury obviously took its job very seriously, and even if Samsung could prevail on a few points it would need to persuade Judge Koh that the jury was wrong on multiple grounds to have much effect on the ultimate award." The jury concluded Samsung's older line of products, such as the Fascinate, Epic 4G and Galaxy SII smartphones, trampled on Apple's design and technology patents. These patents ranged from the shape of an iPhone to its "pinch and zoom" features. The jury also rejected Samsung's counterclaims against Apple, which alleged the Cupertino company infringed on some of its wireless technology patents.

Samsung and Apple did not respond to requests for interviews. But both companies' lawyers have filed stacks of legal arguments in recent months outlining their competing positions.

Among other arguments, Samsung alleges the jury's verdict was tainted by the jury foreman's misconduct, particularly his alleged failure to disclose that he'd been sued in the past by his former employer, Seagate Technology. Samsung, a large stakeholder in Seagate, accuses Velvin Hogan, the foreman, of deliberately omitting the information to get on the jury, and also alleges that his comments to media outlets after the verdict, including to this newspaper, showed bias against Samsung.

Hogan declined to comment, but told this newspaper after Samsung first raised the argument that "there was no jury misconduct." Apple also refutes Samsung's argument that Hogan's conduct tarnished the deliberations.

Legal experts say such arguments are a long shot.

"I don't expect Judge Koh to rule in Samsung's favor on the jury misconduct issue," said Brian Love, a Santa Clara University law professor. "The rules of evidence make it quite hard for a court to reverse a verdict on this basis." Samsung relies on other arguments to set aside the verdict, including the "manifest unfairness" of Koh's restrictions on the amount of time each side could use to present evidence. Samsung also opposes Apple's bid to block the sales of the products, calling it a ploy to "bully Samsung and third parties in an effort to stifle lawful, fair competition." Apple, however, argues Samsung deserves stiff punishment.

"Samsung copied this intellectual property in a calculated effort to wrest market share from Apple," Apple's lawyers wrote.

In fact, the most recent data shows Samsung's smartphones, led by its Galaxy SIII, continue to lead Apple's iPhone in worldwide sales, while Samsung is also putting a dent in Apple's tablet lead.

As a result, a second pending court case between the two companies promises to be the next battleground, even as Koh weighs the recent jury verdict. That case, filed earlier this year by Apple, centers on the newer line of products from both Apple and Samsung, including Samsung's Galaxy SIII phone and Apple's iPhone 5.

Koh has set trial in that case for 2014. The question in the short-term is whether Apple will be able to persuade the judge to use the jury verdict to expand its request for injunctions to Samsung's more recent devices.

"She has the authority to enjoin (the older products) and others that are not substantially different from them in the use of (Apple's) patented technology," Lemley said. "(Apple and Samsung) may well fight over whether current generation products met that definition." Howard Mintz covers legal affairs. Contact him at 408-286-0236. Follow him at Twitter.com/hmintz.

___ (c)2012 the San Jose Mercury News (San Jose, Calif.) Visit the San Jose Mercury News (San Jose, Calif.) at www.mercurynews.com Distributed by MCT Information Services

[ Back To WebRTC Solutions's Homepage ]


Featured Podcasts

Delivering First Class Communications With WebRTC

This webcast captures a recent discussion about WebRTC between Jim Donovan, Director of Product Management at Oracle and Larry Hettick, Editorial Director and Senior Research Fellow at Webtorials. The topics cover WebRTC reliability, interoperability, and security--looking at how Oracle addresses these issues.

Oracle in Enterprise Communications

Most in the industry have heard of the acquisition of Acme Packet by Oracle. What you may not know is that Oracle has a number of telecommunications products including a UC suite, WebRTC Session Controller, and Operations monitoring tools. Oracle is pursuing both the enterprise and service provider.

Featured Whitepapers

ConnectCare & Unified Contact Manager

SPAN's ConnectCare is a WebRTC-based telemedicine app, which allows consumers to easily and instantly avail clinical healthcare from the providers, regardless of their location. This app is extremely useful to healthcare providers, patients and their caregivers alike.

WebRTC Security Concerns

This whitepaper covers two of the most relevant topics in communications industry today: WebRTC and security. We will introduce the problem of security in WebRTC including those traditional VoIP attacks that are going to be present in WebRTC services. Later we will mention ad-hoc WebRTC attacks and protection mechanisms, to close with an overview of identity management solutions.

Migrating Real Time Communications Services to the Web

In the Internet age, businesses that own fixed and mobile communication networks, including traditional Communications Service Providers (CSPs) of all kinds, are being challenged with some tough questions: How do we stay relevant to our customers?

Delivering Enterprise-Class Communications with WebRTC

WebRTC is an emerging industry standard for enabling Web browsers with real-time communications capabilities. It enables enterprises to enhance Web sites, empower BYOD users, and improve video collaboration and on-line meetings, to name but a few examples.

WebRTC Report Extract Reprint

This document examines the growing important of WebRTC, both generally and for telecom service providers. It considers the expanding range of use-cases, the multiple layers of interoperability likely to be desired by telcos, and some implications in terms of network integration and mobility.


Robust Enterprise Grade WebRTC Systems and Services

The emerging WebRTC standard has become one of the industry's hottest topics – and with good reason. Being able to "communications enable the web" has Communications Service Providers as well as Enterprises busily making plans for deployment. But, as these plans unfold, reality is starting to intrude on those plans. Our expectations of telephony services are much higher than web browsing. We expect the phone to connect instantly, operate with minimal disruption, and work seamless across any network, anywhere, at any time. There is also an understanding that phone service is inherently secure. With WebRTC, the expectation is for these applications to behave in the same manner.

This session looks at the user experience and expectations of a WebRTC Enterprise service. It will also cover how a WebRTC enterprise handles security, reliability, and interoperability within browsers and networks.


The Oracle Communications WebRTC Session Controller enables communications service providers (CSPs) and enterprises to offer WebRTC services – from virtually any device, across virtually any network – with carrier-grade reliability and security.

Sales Presentation: Oracle Communications WebRTC Session Controller

- WebRTC Market and Opportunities
- WebRTC Challenges
- Oracle Communication WebRTC Session   Controller
- Summary


Communication Service Provider (CSP) voice service revenues continue to face pressure due to shifts in communication preferences and competition from non-traditional service providers. Voice communications are now often embedded into applications outside the domain of traditional telephony voice usage. CSPs have been challenged to effectively leverage and monetize new web-oriented communications technologies.