WebRTC Solutions Industry News

TMCNet:  VMS Migration Strategies [Security Technology Executive]

[December 14, 2012]

VMS Migration Strategies [Security Technology Executive]

(Security Technology Executive Via Acquire Media NewsEdge) How to move to the right system for you Over the past several years, the shift from analog to IP video surveillance has picked up considerable steam. The benefits of IP over analog are numerous and begin simply with better video quality. IP breaks past NTSC restrictions with newer codecs in encoders, along with the ability to use HD and megapixel IP cameras. It also allows us to retain data for longer with the help of larger hard drive devices and shared storage capacity on NVRs.

Switching over to IP also provides more flexibility in that organizations can use commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) IT equipment and network infrastructure that's already in place. With the right security software installed, organizations can use their own servers and storage instead of the proprietary DVRs used with analog systems. Additionally, IP-based systems allow you to easily set up workstations and remote monitoring stations as long as there is network or Internet access.

The other major reasons to move to an IP network are reliability and intelligence. With NVRs, you have the ability to deploy redundancy and failover mechanisms; with DVRs you cannot. And IP networks enable you to better analyze and draw conclusions from captured video because of the additional metadata that can accompany the video.

Clearly the benefits of using an IP-based network for video surveillance are substantial enough for any organization to seriously consider a shift. So the question is - what's the best way to migrate Finding the most cost-effective and non-disruptive path for switching over has become a primary objective for many security and IT departments. The good news is there are migration paths that don't require organizations to rip and replace everything, but instead allow them to migrate in steps.

To decide which migration option is best for your organization, you need to look at what the organization moving from, where you want the organization to be, and how long -and how much - should be spent to get there.

Today, a typical analog CCTV system might start with a set of analog cameras connected via coax and fiber to a set of DVRs, which are potentially looped through to an analog matrix switch. In this configuration, operators are either using a CCTV keyboard attached to the matrix switch to control camera call up on the matrix switch's monitors, or they might be using DVR-viewing software on PCs to view multiple cameras from multiple DVRs.

Let's look at some different options to migrate to IR Option 1: Video Encoders One option would be to replace the DVRs with multichannel network IP video encoders. The encoders could send the digitized video over the network to a set of NVRs, which are typically under the management of a single centrai server. The analog switch is replaced by the IP network switch and video management software. In order to view the video, analog matrix switch monitors would be replaced with PCs running decoder software that are attached to large flat screens. This then creates a Video Wall and the Virtual Matrix.

Option 2: Hybrid Recording In the event that replacing DVRs is possible, but placing video on the network isn't very attractive, hybrid recorders solve this issue. Hybrid recorders are essentially COTS NVRs with separate grabber cards inside them, or directly attached. As far as the operator is concerned, it looks and feels like IP video. And in the event that the network goes down or is congested, recording continues without fail. This concept is referred to as recording at the edge because the cameras' video does not touch the IP network in order to be recorded.

With both option 1 and 2, the recorders can capture video from existing analog cameras as well as new IP cameras. This creates a smooth migration strategy that enables organizations to experiment with newer HD and megapixel cameras and gradually phase out and replace analog cameras as desired.

Another important aspect to note about these two options is that all the effort takes place at the head-end, which is all about how video is managed, recorded and displayed. In short, we're not touching cameras or their wiring, which saves time, money and effort.

Option 3: IP Cameras Now let's say you wanted to replace analog cameras with IP cameras to give you the potential of HD or better video quality. This move still requires that you replace DVRs with NVRs or hybrid recorders. An IP camera is a network device and as such cannot simply reuse the existing coax cabling analog cameras use. You have two choices in this case: Replace the coax with network cables (or wireless infrastructure, which is possible but not very common). It is a significant effort, but one which brings many benefits since a single network cable can carry video from many cameras, one- or two-way audio, PTZ control signals, alarm inputs, relay outputs and even power. Also, you may be able to leverage existing network switches and/or network cabling.

Use an adaptor. There are adaptors that can make a length of coax appear like a network cable by inserting one between the camera and the cable, and one between the cable and the network switch.

Option 3 requires the greatest amount of effort and cost but will move you immediately upon completion to pure IP. If you are not ready to take that leap, options 1 or 2 might be the right path for you. Just weigh your considerations carefully. If you plan to migrate to pure IP eventually, it may make sense to do it in one stage (option 3), rather than taking a twostage approach (option 1 or 2, followed by option 3). Weigh the costs, benefits and other considerations carefully.

Other Migration Issues Analog to IP aside, there are other video migration challenges that organizations can face. For example, say one company with one Video Management System (VMS) acquires another company with a totally different brand of VMS. Whether the two systems are analog or IP-based is not the main factor here - what is important is the need to merge the systems into a single user interface, so they are easily managed and appear as one system to the operator.

This can be achieved by replacing the two different user interfaces with a VMS-agnostic software that presents one view to the operator, while the separate Video Management Systems continue to run in the background. This software, known as PSIM (physical security information management), can merge different brands of systems into one user interface, whether they be VMS, access control, intrusion, or other physical security sub-systems.

A Merger & Acquisition (M&A) scenario is just one case where you might want to use PSIM to provide a single view of multiple VMS systems. Maybe you want to replace your existing video system for some other reason. Is the VMS vendor still in business Have they "end-of-lifed" their product Has their support gone downhill, their pricing gone up You many have any one of a number of motivations to change.

Still, a full rip and replace may not be as attractive as a gradual phase out/ replacement, for budgetary or other reasons. The right PSIM software can integrate multiple systems without the operator ever having to know there are two or more video systems running behind the scenes.

Video encoders can range from one up to as many channels as needed.

To use IP cameras, you must either replace the coax or use a special adaptor.

Hybrid recorders give operators the look and feel of IP video.

By Dr. Bob Banerjee Dr. Bob Banerjee is Senior Director of Training and Development for NICE Systems Security Division. In this position, he develops programs and initiatives to educate, train and support the company's extensive network of security system integrators and dealers, and provide thought leadership for its security industry outreach efforts. Banerjee has more than a decade of high tech and security industry experience, having also held senior marketing and global product management positions at Bosch Security Systems, Intuitive Systems, OneSource Information Services, Axeda Systems and Nortel Networks. He holds a Ph.D. in Artificial Intelligence from the Advanced Research Center at the University of Bristol, England. Dr. Banerjee can be contacted at Bob. Banerjee&nice.com.

(c) 2012 Cygnus Business Media

[ Back To WebRTC Solutions's Homepage ]

FOLLOW US

Featured Podcasts

Oracle in Enterprise Communications

Most in the industry have heard of the acquisition of Acme Packet by Oracle. What you may not know is that Oracle has a number of telecommunications products including a UC suite, WebRTC Session Controller, and Operations monitoring tools. Oracle is pursuing both the enterprise and service provider.

Featured Whitepapers

WebRTC Security Concerns

This whitepaper covers two of the most relevant topics in communications industry today: WebRTC and security. We will introduce the problem of security in WebRTC including those traditional VoIP attacks that are going to be present in WebRTC services. Later we will mention ad-hoc WebRTC attacks and protection mechanisms, to close with an overview of identity management solutions.

Migrating Real Time Communications Services to the Web

In the Internet age, businesses that own fixed and mobile communication networks, including traditional Communications Service Providers (CSPs) of all kinds, are being challenged with some tough questions: How do we stay relevant to our customers?

Delivering Enterprise-Class Communications with WebRTC

WebRTC is an emerging industry standard for enabling Web browsers with real-time communications capabilities. It enables enterprises to enhance Web sites, empower BYOD users, and improve video collaboration and on-line meetings, to name but a few examples.

WebRTC Report Extract Reprint

This document examines the growing important of WebRTC, both generally and for telecom service providers. It considers the expanding range of use-cases, the multiple layers of interoperability likely to be desired by telcos, and some implications in terms of network integration and mobility.

WEBRTC SOLUTIONS PAPERS, SLIDES, COLLATERAL

Robust Enterprise Grade WebRTC Systems and Services


The emerging WebRTC standard has become one of the industry's hottest topics – and with good reason. Being able to "communications enable the web" has Communications Service Providers as well as Enterprises busily making plans for deployment. But, as these plans unfold, reality is starting to intrude on those plans. Our expectations of telephony services are much higher than web browsing. We expect the phone to connect instantly, operate with minimal disruption, and work seamless across any network, anywhere, at any time. There is also an understanding that phone service is inherently secure. With WebRTC, the expectation is for these applications to behave in the same manner.

This session looks at the user experience and expectations of a WebRTC Enterprise service. It will also cover how a WebRTC enterprise handles security, reliability, and interoperability within browsers and networks.

ORACLE COMMUNICATIONS WEBRTC SESSION CONTROLLER

The Oracle Communications WebRTC Session Controller enables communications service providers (CSPs) and enterprises to offer WebRTC services – from virtually any device, across virtually any network – with carrier-grade reliability and security.

Sales Presentation: Oracle Communications WebRTC Session Controller

Agenda:
- WebRTC Market and Opportunities
- WebRTC Challenges
- Oracle Communication WebRTC Session   Controller
- Summary

ORACLE COMMUNICATIONS WEBRTC SESSION CONTROLLER SOLUTION

Communication Service Provider (CSP) voice service revenues continue to face pressure due to shifts in communication preferences and competition from non-traditional service providers. Voice communications are now often embedded into applications outside the domain of traditional telephony voice usage. CSPs have been challenged to effectively leverage and monetize new web-oriented communications technologies.